{"$schema":"https://policywindow.org/critique/api/schema","name":"Critical AI — selection queue","description":"Recently-published, top-tier social-science papers on AI/AGI, ranked by a re-derivable score (impact, value-add, recency, tier). Selection criteria made auditable.","docs":"https://policywindow.org/critique/queue","as_of":"2026-06-17T14:05:00.776Z","weights":{"impact":0.3,"valueAdd":0.3,"recency":0.2,"tier":0.2},"fragility_weights":{"causalOverreach":0.3,"policyOverreach":0.25,"agiByAssertion":0.2,"generalisationLeap":0.15,"reproducibilityRisk":0.1},"monitored_venues":137,"count":29,"queue":[{"rank":1,"score":88.6,"breakdown":{"impact":1,"valueAdd":0.7,"recency":0.8777777777777778,"tier":1,"total":88.55555555555557,"ageDays":41},"id":"unraveling-generative-ai-from-a-human-intelligence","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160612092","title":"Unraveling Generative AI from a Human Intelligence Perspective: A Battery of Experiments","authors":["Wen Wang","Siqi Pei","Tianshu Sun"],"venue":"Information Systems Research","field":"Information systems","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/isre.2023.0487","publicationDate":"2026-05-08","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":true,"agiByAssertion":true,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["human_AI_interaction","labour_markets","foresight_AGI_transition"],"whyFlagged":"The headline claim that 'GPT-4 outperforms humans in cognitive, emotional, and creative intelligence' anthropomorphizes benchmark scores into human-like 'intelligence' and then leaps to forecasting job-level labor-market impacts for policymakers, an overreach built on one model and human-derived tests of uncertain construct validity.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0487"},{"rank":2,"score":83,"breakdown":{"impact":1,"valueAdd":0.6,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":83,"ageDays":19},"id":"from-rule-of-law-to-rule-of-algorithm-generative-a","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7162857352","title":"From rule of law to rule of algorithm: Generative Artificial Intelligence's threat to democracy","authors":["A.T. Kingsmith"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261451458","publicationDate":"2026-05-30","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":true,"agiByAssertion":true,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["AI_governance","law_regulation","political_economy"],"whyFlagged":"The sweeping claim that GenAI marks a 'qualitative break' replacing rule of law with rule of algorithm and threatening democracy is a commentary asserted by argument rather than evidence, and judges the EU AI Act 'insufficient' without empirical support.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261451458"},{"rank":3,"score":81.6,"breakdown":{"impact":1,"valueAdd":0.5499999999999999,"recency":0.7555555555555555,"tier":1,"total":81.6111111111111,"ageDays":52},"id":"more-versus-better-artificial-intelligence-incenti","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7155816294","title":"More Versus Better: Artificial Intelligence, Incentives, and the Emerging Crisis in Peer Review","authors":["Claudine Madras Gartenberg","Sharique Hasan","Alex Murray","Lamar Pierce"],"venue":"Organization Science","field":"Management & organisation","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3","publicationDate":"2026-04-27","citedByCount":9,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":true,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["knowledge_production","labour_markets"],"whyFlagged":"The high-profile claim that AI drove a 42% submission surge and declining writing quality rests on single-journal before/after data with AI authorship inferred from detectors, so the causal attribution to AI and the generalisation to all of science (via editor 'conversations') outrun the evidence.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2026.ed.v37.n3"},{"rank":4,"score":80,"breakdown":{"impact":1,"valueAdd":0.5,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":80,"ageDays":23},"id":"the-rise-of-ai-sovereignty-authoritarian-technolog","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7162443528","title":"The rise of AI sovereignty: Authoritarian technological imaginaries as a form of reflexive control","authors":["Gregory Asmolov"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261426455","publicationDate":"2026-05-26","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":true,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["AI_governance","political_economy","surveillance_security_policing"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that Russian 'reflexive control' shapes global AI-governance debates and can distinguish legitimate Global South concerns from authoritarian influence rests on a single-actor reading of presidential statements, so the normative policy prescription overreaches a thin, non-reproducible evidentiary base.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261426455"},{"rank":5,"score":79.6,"breakdown":{"impact":0.92,"valueAdd":0.4,"recency":1,"tier":1,"total":79.60000000000001,"ageDays":9},"id":"artificial-collusion-examining-supracompetitive-pr","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7164011033","title":"Artificial Collusion: Examining Supracompetitive Pricing by Q-Learning Algorithms","authors":["Arnoud den Boer","Janusz M Meylahn","Maarten Pieter Schinkel"],"venue":"Management Science","field":"Management & organisation","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2024.08557","publicationDate":"2026-06-09","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":4,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":true,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["law_regulation","AI_governance","innovation_productivity_competition"],"whyFlagged":"Concluding that competition agencies need not be suspicious of pricing algorithms rests on debunking one algorithm class (Q-learning) under specific synchronization conditions, a reassuring policy inference that may not generalize to other RL pricing methods.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2024.08557"},{"rank":6,"score":74.5,"breakdown":{"impact":1,"valueAdd":0.15,"recency":1,"tier":1,"total":74.49999999999999,"ageDays":6},"id":"the-cybernetic-teammate-a-field-experiment-on-gene","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7164527973","title":"The Cybernetic Teammate: A Field Experiment on Generative AI and Teamwork","authors":["Fabrizio Dell’Acqua","Charles Ayoubi","Hila Lifshitz‐Assaf","Raffaella Sadun","Ethan Mollick","Lilach Mollick","Yi Han","Jeff Goldman"],"venue":"Organization Science","field":"Management & organisation","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2025.20702","publicationDate":"2026-06-12","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["labour_markets","human_AI_interaction","innovation_productivity_competition"],"whyFlagged":"The headline claim that 'individuals with AI matched teams without AI' is causally clean given the preregistered RCT, but generalizing a single-firm (P&G) product-innovation task to knowledge work broadly is the likely weak point.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2025.20702"},{"rank":7,"score":74.5,"breakdown":{"impact":0.84,"valueAdd":0.44999999999999996,"recency":0.7888888888888889,"tier":1,"total":74.47777777777777,"ageDays":49},"id":"how-costs-influence-preferences-for-control-in-gen","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160047314","title":"How Costs Influence Preferences for Control in Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI): Human-Guided vs. GenAI-Based Delegated Search","authors":["Lei Wang","Ho Cheung Brian Lee"],"venue":"Information Systems Research","field":"Information systems","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/isre.2025.1836","publicationDate":"2026-04-30","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":true,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["human_AI_interaction","political_economy"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that salient usage costs make users more deliberate cocreators and raise service value is drawn from observational analysis of 1.8 million prompts where cost salience is likely confounded with user type and task, so the causal interpretation of charging-improves-outcomes is fragile.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2025.1836"},{"rank":8,"score":72.5,"breakdown":{"impact":1,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":72.5,"ageDays":17},"id":"generative-ai-propaganda-and-digital-authoritarian","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7163136137","title":"Generative AI, propaganda, and digital authoritarianism: Comparative insights from six democratically weakened countries","authors":["Gabrielle D. Beacken","Inga K Trauthig","Samuel Woolley"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517251410064","publicationDate":"2026-06-01","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["surveillance_security_policing","political_economy","AI_governance"],"whyFlagged":"The argument that GenAI propaganda spreads 'digital authoritarian tactics' into semi-democracies is built from 93 interviews across six purposively chosen countries, so the comparative generalization and qualitative-coding reproducibility are the soft spots.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517251410064"},{"rank":9,"score":72.1,"breakdown":{"impact":0.92,"valueAdd":0.15,"recency":1,"tier":1,"total":72.10000000000001,"ageDays":28},"id":"can-chatgpt-kill-user-generated-q-amp-a-platforms","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7162000424","title":"Can ChatGPT Kill User-Generated Q&A Platforms?","authors":["Junzhi Xue","Lizheng Wang","Jinyang Zheng","Yongjun Li","Yong Tan"],"venue":"Information Systems Research","field":"Information systems","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/isre.2023.0561","publicationDate":"2026-05-21","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":4,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["labour_markets","knowledge_production","innovation_productivity_competition"],"whyFlagged":"The headline causal claim that ChatGPT cut Stack Overflow question volume by ~14% (up to 27.9%) is identification-dependent on isolating the LLM shock from confounding platform trends, and the 'niche partitioning not displacement' conclusion generalizes from one platform to knowledge ecosystems broadly.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0561"},{"rank":10,"score":70.8,"breakdown":{"impact":0.88,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":0.8444444444444444,"tier":1,"total":70.7888888888889,"ageDays":44},"id":"made-with-ai-consumer-engagement-with-social-media","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160542529","title":"Made With AI: Consumer Engagement with Social Media Containing AI Disclosures","authors":["Stephan Carney","Ignacio Riveros","Stephanie Tully"],"venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","field":"Marketing","tier":"S","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucag013","publicationDate":"2026-05-05","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":true,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":false,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["human_AI_interaction","law_regulation"],"whyFlagged":"The central finding that AI-disclosure labels reduce engagement via lowered parasocial connection is well-identified via experiments, but the implied policy guidance that effort-signaling disclosures should be used to 'mitigate' engagement loss edges toward prescribing how to blunt the very transparency the disclosures exist to provide.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucag013"},{"rank":11,"score":70.3,"breakdown":{"impact":0.72,"valueAdd":0.4,"recency":0.8333333333333334,"tier":1,"total":70.26666666666665,"ageDays":45},"id":"backfiring-ai-ai-deployment-in-workplace","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160295950","title":"Backfiring AI? AI Deployment in Workplace","authors":["Di Yuan","Manmohan Aseri","Narayan Ramasubbu"],"venue":"Management Science","field":"Management & organisation","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.03108","publicationDate":"2026-05-04","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":true,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["labour_markets","political_economy"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that AI-facilitated knowledge transfer can backfire and lower firm productivity is derived from a stylized game-theoretic model, yet the abstract issues concrete managerial policy recommendations as if empirically validated.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.03108"},{"rank":12,"score":70.3,"breakdown":{"impact":0.84,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":0.8777777777777778,"tier":1,"total":70.25555555555556,"ageDays":41},"id":"when-influencers-delegate-replies-how-social-ai-ag","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160599834","title":"When Influencers Delegate Replies: How Social AI Agents Shape User Engagement","authors":["Maggie Mengqing Zhang","Yang Gao","Jingjing Li","Steven L. Johnson"],"venue":"Information Systems Research","field":"Information systems","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/isre.2025.2270","publicationDate":"2026-05-08","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["human_AI_interaction","labour_markets"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that delegating replies to an LLM agent causally increases user engagement rests on a single-platform staggered DiD whose 'AI reply received' assignment is likely endogenous to influencer behavior, and the proprietary, undisclosed-platform data makes the effect hard to reproduce or generalize.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2025.2270"},{"rank":13,"score":70.1,"breakdown":{"impact":0.8,"valueAdd":0.3,"recency":0.8555555555555556,"tier":1,"total":70.1111111111111,"ageDays":43},"id":"scp-artificial-intelligence-scp-adoption-and-the-d","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160399888","title":"Artificial intelligence adoption and the demand for managerial expertise","authors":["Liudmila Alekseeva","José Azar","Mireia Giné","Sampsa Samila"],"venue":"Strategic Management Journal","field":"Management & organisation","tier":"S","doi":"10.1002/smj.70099","publicationDate":"2026-05-06","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":4,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":true,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":false,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["labour_markets","innovation_productivity_competition"],"whyFlagged":"The headline claim that AI adoption reconfigures managerial roles toward interpersonal/growth skills rests on cross-sectional associations between job-posting-derived adoption measures and vacancy composition, yet the framing implies AI is causing the skill shift rather than co-varying with unobserved firm strategy.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70099"},{"rank":14,"score":67.2,"breakdown":{"impact":0.76,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":0.8444444444444444,"tier":1,"total":67.1888888888889,"ageDays":44},"id":"leveraging-generative-artificial-intelligence-to-c","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160238712","title":"Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence to Create Visual Content in Digital Advertising","authors":["Remi Daviet","Yohei Nishimura"],"venue":"Marketing Science","field":"Marketing","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/mksc.2024.1130","publicationDate":"2026-05-05","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":2,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["innovation_productivity_competition","human_AI_interaction"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that a Bayesian active-learning GenAI framework efficiently discovers effective brand-aligned ad designs is asserted in a one-sentence abstract with no reported sample, baseline, or effect size, making both the generalisation and reproducibility unverifiable.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2024.1130"},{"rank":15,"score":67.1,"breakdown":{"impact":0.92,"valueAdd":0.15,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":67.10000000000001,"ageDays":17},"id":"the-politics-of-artificial-intelligence-alignment","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7162990296","title":"The politics of artificial intelligence alignment: Public reactions to AI moderation in the case of Google’s Gemini","authors":["Adrian Rauchfleisch","Andreas Jungherr"],"venue":"New Media & Society","field":"Communication & media","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/14614448261449271","publicationDate":"2026-06-01","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":4,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["AI_governance","human_AI_interaction","law_regulation"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that a visible AI product failure (Gemini images) shifts public support for AI moderation is from a preregistered experiment, but one of two stimulus sets failed to reach significance, so generalizing the 'focusing event' effect beyond this single controversy is fragile.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261449271"},{"rank":16,"score":66.8,"breakdown":{"impact":0.92,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":0.8333333333333334,"tier":0.75,"total":66.76666666666668,"ageDays":45},"id":"refusal-as-silence-gendered-disparities-in-vision","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160318704","title":"Refusal as silence: Gendered disparities in Vision-Language Model responses","authors":["Sha Luo","S Kim","Zening Duan","Kaiping Chen"],"venue":"New Media & Society","field":"Communication & media","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/14614448261441886","publicationDate":"2026-05-04","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":4,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["inequality_bias_fairness","human_AI_interaction"],"whyFlagged":"The finding that GPT-4V refuses transgender/non-binary personas at higher rates is a striking fairness claim, but it rests on a single proprietary model and a constrained counterfactual-persona task whose generalisability across models, versions, and prompt designs is unestablished.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261441886"},{"rank":17,"score":66.2,"breakdown":{"impact":0.84,"valueAdd":0.2,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":66.2,"ageDays":29},"id":"making-genai-valuable-benchmarks-singularities-and","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7161816246","title":"Making GenAI valuable: Benchmarks, singularities, and the enrichment economy","authors":["Claudia Aradau","Tobias Blanke"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261451463","publicationDate":"2026-05-20","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":true,"generalisationLeap":false,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["political_economy","knowledge_production","foresight_AGI_transition"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that benchmarks 'singularise' LLMs by situating them near a 'future perfect of AGI' treats AGI as an assumed horizon mobilized for valuation rather than a tested construct, so the AGI framing is asserted and theory-driven rather than evidenced.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261451463"},{"rank":18,"score":65.9,"breakdown":{"impact":0.88,"valueAdd":0.15,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":65.9,"ageDays":14},"id":"ai-meets-politics-examining-the-effects-of-differe","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7163639214","title":"AI meets politics: Examining the effects of different targeting strategies across 15 countries","authors":["Sanne Kruikemeier","Svenja Schäfer","Alice Hamilton","Puck Guldemond","Jade Vrielink","Carmen Dymanus","Annelien Van Remoortere","Sanne Tamboer"],"venue":"New Media & Society","field":"Communication & media","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/14614448261445063","publicationDate":"2026-06-04","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":5,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["political_economy","human_AI_interaction","surveillance_security_policing"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that AI-generated targeting only persuades along pre-existing political orientation (not age/personality) is experimentally grounded, but the null results on personality targeting risk being read as 'AI microtargeting doesn't work,' an overgeneralization from one EU-election survey-experiment.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261445063"},{"rank":19,"score":65.3,"breakdown":{"impact":0.76,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":65.3,"ageDays":23},"id":"beyond-disruption-and-invisibility-interactional-c","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7162519578","title":"Beyond disruption and invisibility: Interactional continuity in everyday AI use in India","authors":["Emilia Edwards","Dhiraj Murthy"],"venue":"New Media & Society","field":"Communication & media","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/14614448261448545","publicationDate":"2026-05-26","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":2,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["human_AI_interaction","labour_markets","knowledge_production"],"whyFlagged":"The 'interactional continuity' framing of everyday AI use is conceptually central but rests on 28 interviews in a single Indian workplace with AI-assisted coding, so the Global South generalization and reproducibility of the qualitative inference are the weak points.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261448545"},{"rank":20,"score":65.3,"breakdown":{"impact":0.76,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":65.3,"ageDays":27},"id":"crafting-computer-vision-through-human-eyes-an-ai","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7162066325","title":"Crafting computer vision through human eyes: An AI laboratory ethnography","authors":["Luqing Zhou"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261438637","publicationDate":"2026-05-22","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":2,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["knowledge_production","human_AI_interaction"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that CV knowledge production is fundamentally a sensory, processual system generalizes from one 9-month single-lab ethnography, so the leap to AI epistemics writ large and the non-replicable design are its weak points.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261438637"},{"rank":21,"score":65.3,"breakdown":{"impact":0.76,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":65.3,"ageDays":30},"id":"from-prompt-engineering-to-prompt-design-research","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7161823984","title":"From prompt engineering to prompt design: Research strategies for visual generative AI","authors":["Gabriele Colombo","Sabine Niederer","Carlo De Gaetano"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261451462","publicationDate":"2026-05-19","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":2,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["knowledge_production","human_AI_interaction","inequality_bias_fairness"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that prompt-design strategies reveal stable model 'house styles' and biases rests on a single biodiversity case demo across a couple of years, so the generalization to a method for auditing generative AI broadly and the non-systematic, hard-to-reproduce setup are the weak points.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261451462"},{"rank":22,"score":63.3,"breakdown":{"impact":0.76,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":0.9,"tier":0.75,"total":63.3,"ageDays":39},"id":"into-the-black-box-laypeople-s-folk-theories-about","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160830950","title":"Into the black box: Laypeople's folk theories about generative artificial intelligence chatbots","authors":["Li Z","Nuri Kim","L Chen"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261447838","publicationDate":"2026-05-10","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":2,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["human_AI_interaction","knowledge_production"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that laypeople's folk theories of GenAI chatbots fall into three constructed areas that shape interaction strategies generalizes from a handful of focus groups, so the leap to 'laypeople' broadly and the non-reproducible qualitative base are the weak points.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261447838"},{"rank":23,"score":63.2,"breakdown":{"impact":0.72,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":0.9555555555555556,"tier":0.75,"total":63.21111111111111,"ageDays":34},"id":"working-the-algorithm-contextual-skills-of-on-dema","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7161230195","title":"Working the algorithm: Contextual skills of on-demand gig workers","authors":["Xinyi Hong","Xinyi Cheng","Dong Liu"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261449362","publicationDate":"2026-05-15","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["labour_markets","human_AI_interaction"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that gig workers cultivate a nine-indicator framework of 'algorithmic skills' affording meaningful agency is built from just 20 interviews, so the generalization of a tidy taxonomy and the contention that it outperforms the control-resistance framework outrun the small, non-reproducible sample.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261449362"},{"rank":24,"score":62.9,"breakdown":{"impact":0.6,"valueAdd":0.44999999999999996,"recency":0.8222222222222222,"tier":0.75,"total":62.94444444444445,"ageDays":46},"id":"being-literate-behaving-literate-a-mixed-methods-a","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160141457","title":"Being literate, behaving literate? A mixed-methods approach to adolescents’ algorithm literacy and behavioral strategies on social media","authors":["Larissa Leonhard","Ruth Wendt","Claudia Riesmeyer"],"venue":"New Media & Society","field":"Communication & media","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/14614448261446589","publicationDate":"2026-05-03","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":3,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":true,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["education","human_AI_interaction"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that higher algorithm knowledge correlates with reduced interactive behavior is presented with a causal mechanism ('reluctance to engage with profiling') from a cross-sectional survey of German 14-17 year-olds, conflating correlation with explanation and limiting generalisation beyond that cohort.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261446589"},{"rank":25,"score":61.8,"breakdown":{"impact":0.84,"valueAdd":0.2,"recency":0.7777777777777778,"tier":0.75,"total":61.75555555555556,"ageDays":50},"id":"charismatic-machines-on-the-epistemic-power-of-gen","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7159867647","title":"Charismatic machines: On the epistemic power of generative AI within platform convergence","authors":["Mauro Barisione"],"venue":"New Media & Society","field":"Communication & media","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/14614448261441417","publicationDate":"2026-04-29","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":5,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":true,"generalisationLeap":false,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["knowledge_production","human_AI_interaction"],"whyFlagged":"The central claim that generative AI wields 'epistemic power' as 'charismatic machines' perceived as both human-like and superhuman is a Bourdieu/Weber-grounded theoretical construct asserted rather than empirically tested, attributing authority-conferring effects to AI by analogy.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261441417"},{"rank":26,"score":61.7,"breakdown":{"impact":0.64,"valueAdd":0.25,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":61.7,"ageDays":29},"id":"algorithmic-responsibility-in-ppc-practice-interpr","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7161856263","title":"Algorithmic responsibility in PPC practice: Interpreting black boxes in digital advertising work","authors":["Natalia Chrobak"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261449365","publicationDate":"2026-05-20","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":2,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["labour_markets","human_AI_interaction"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that PPC work is shifting from a technical to an interpretive profession under algorithmic opacity generalizes a broad theory of 'algorithmic responsibility' from 27 interviews and forum posts, making the leap to the wider data economy and the non-reproducible qualitative base its weak points.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261449365"},{"rank":27,"score":61.1,"breakdown":{"impact":0.72,"valueAdd":0.15,"recency":1,"tier":0.75,"total":61.1,"ageDays":30},"id":"resilience-and-disempowerment-in-algorithmic-syste","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7161624169","title":"Resilience and disempowerment in algorithmic systems","authors":["Samantha M. Jones","Erin A. Heerey"],"venue":"New Media & Society","field":"Communication & media","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/14614448261446591","publicationDate":"2026-05-19","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":true,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["human_AI_interaction","knowledge_production"],"whyFlagged":"The strongest claim that adaptive recommendation algorithms cause more homogeneous user selections comes from a small (N=263) controlled feed experiment, so generalizing from a stylized lab feed to real social-media algorithmic influence on agency is the weak point.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261446591"},{"rank":28,"score":58,"breakdown":{"impact":0.6,"valueAdd":0,"recency":1,"tier":1,"total":58.00000000000001,"ageDays":13},"id":"markovian-search-with-ex-ante-constraints-theory-a","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7163688602","title":"Markovian Search with Ex Ante Constraints: Theory and Applications to Socially Aware Algorithmic Hiring","authors":["Mohammad Reza Aminian","Vahideh Manshadi","Rad Niazadeh"],"venue":"Management Science","field":"Management & organisation","tier":"S","doi":"10.1287/mnsc.2023.04079","publicationDate":"2026-06-05","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":3,"societalSalience":3,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":false,"reproducibilityRisk":false},"aiAgiCategories":["inequality_bias_fairness","law_regulation"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that ex ante fairness constraints yield 'socially desirable outcomes' in algorithmic hiring is an optimization-theory result whose normative weak point is equating demographic-parity-style constraints with genuine equity, demonstrated only via a numerical study.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.04079"},{"rank":29,"score":53.9,"breakdown":{"impact":0.64,"valueAdd":0.1,"recency":0.8333333333333334,"tier":0.75,"total":53.866666666666674,"ageDays":45},"id":"the-pragmatic-frames-of-spurious-correlations-in-m","openalexId":"https://openalex.org/W7160150228","title":"The pragmatic frames of spurious correlations in machine learning: Interpreting how and why they matter","authors":["Samuel J. Bell","Skyler Wang"],"venue":"Big Data & Society","field":"Science & technology studies","tier":"A","doi":"10.1177/20539517261447575","publicationDate":"2026-05-04","citedByCount":0,"aiAgiCentrality":4,"societalSalience":2,"fragility":{"causalOverreach":false,"policyOverreach":false,"agiByAssertion":false,"generalisationLeap":false,"reproducibilityRisk":true},"aiAgiCategories":["knowledge_production","inequality_bias_fairness"],"whyFlagged":"The claim that ML researchers judge spuriousness through four 'pragmatic frames' is an interpretive taxonomy drawn from an unspecified 'broad survey' of literature, so the framework's completeness and coding reliability are not demonstrable from the abstract.","doi_url":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261447575"}]}