{"$schema":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/accountability-agenda.json","name":"Policy Window accountability agenda — what to do","description":"The harms prioritised by accountability deficit, each with the single structural action-type that would most close its gap (establish governance / elevate to binding / build enforcement / commission evaluation / deepen coverage). Derived from the accountability-completeness diagnostic. Field-level structural gap-closers, NOT targeted advocacy asks or legal advice.","docs":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/accountability-agenda","actionTypes":{"establish_governance":"Establish any governance","elevate_to_binding":"Elevate from soft to binding rule","build_enforcement":"Build an enforcement mechanism","commission_evaluation":"Commission an efficacy evaluation","deepen_coverage":"Deepen instrument coverage","maintain":"Maintain — no first-order deficit"},"summary":{"harms":23,"meanDeficitScore":3.13,"byAction":[{"action":"establish_governance","harms":0},{"action":"elevate_to_binding","harms":0},{"action":"build_enforcement","harms":13},{"action":"commission_evaluation","harms":10},{"action":"deepen_coverage","harms":0},{"action":"maintain","harms":0}],"needEnforcement":13,"needBindingRule":0,"needEvaluation":10,"cleanHarms":0},"items":[{"code":"compute_export_controls","label":"Compute + Model-Weight Export Controls","governingInstruments":4,"bindingLaw":1,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"education","label":"AI in Education","governingInstruments":5,"bindingLaw":3,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"thin","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"sovereign_ai","label":"Sovereign AI Doctrine","governingInstruments":5,"bindingLaw":5,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"ai_worker_displacement","label":"AI-Driven Worker Displacement","governingInstruments":9,"bindingLaw":3,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"thin","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"tech_sovereignty","label":"Technological Sovereignty","governingInstruments":11,"bindingLaw":5,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"environmental_impact_of_training","label":"Environmental Impact of AI Training","governingInstruments":12,"bindingLaw":4,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"national_security_carveouts","label":"National Security Carveouts in AI Regulation","governingInstruments":12,"bindingLaw":8,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"open_weight_release","label":"Open-Weight Frontier Release","governingInstruments":12,"bindingLaw":5,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"compute_reporting","label":"Compute-Threshold Reporting","governingInstruments":16,"bindingLaw":7,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"international_coordination","label":"International Coordination","governingInstruments":16,"bindingLaw":3,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"synthetic_content_provenance","label":"Synthetic Content Provenance","governingInstruments":17,"bindingLaw":7,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"thin","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"agentic_systems_governance","label":"Agentic AI Governance","governingInstruments":18,"bindingLaw":9,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"catastrophic_risk","label":"Catastrophic & Existential Risk","governingInstruments":22,"bindingLaw":7,"enforcement":0,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["unenforced","no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":4,"primaryAction":"build_enforcement","rationale":"A binding rule exists but no enforcement case is catalogued — paper protection."},{"code":"criminal_justice","label":"AI in Criminal Justice","governingInstruments":6,"bindingLaw":4,"enforcement":1,"efficacyStatus":"thin","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy thin)."},{"code":"healthcare","label":"AI in Healthcare","governingInstruments":7,"bindingLaw":4,"enforcement":1,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy absent)."},{"code":"biometric_id","label":"Biometric Identification","governingInstruments":8,"bindingLaw":6,"enforcement":3,"efficacyStatus":"thin","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy thin)."},{"code":"employment","label":"AI in Employment","governingInstruments":8,"bindingLaw":5,"enforcement":2,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy absent)."},{"code":"development_rights_framing","label":"Development-Rights Framings","governingInstruments":11,"bindingLaw":5,"enforcement":1,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy absent)."},{"code":"deepfakes","label":"Deepfakes / Synthetic Content","governingInstruments":14,"bindingLaw":8,"enforcement":3,"efficacyStatus":"thin","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy thin)."},{"code":"training_data","label":"Training-Data Rights","governingInstruments":20,"bindingLaw":10,"enforcement":5,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy absent)."},{"code":"redress","label":"Individual Redress","governingInstruments":27,"bindingLaw":15,"enforcement":11,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy absent)."},{"code":"foundation_models","label":"Foundation Models / GPAI","governingInstruments":34,"bindingLaw":13,"enforcement":5,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy absent)."},{"code":"transparency","label":"Transparency Obligations","governingInstruments":41,"bindingLaw":18,"enforcement":9,"efficacyStatus":"absent","deficits":["no_efficacy_evidence"],"deficitScore":2,"primaryAction":"commission_evaluation","rationale":"Governance and enforcement exist, but no rigorous evidence shows they reduce the harm (efficacy absent)."}],"caveat":"This agenda is derived from the catalog's RECORD of governance, enforcement, and efficacy evidence (it inherits the caveats of coverage-equity + accountability-completeness, including that lever counts ignore an instrument's lifecycle status). An 'action-type' names the structural gap a reader should scrutinise — e.g. a binding rule with no catalogued enforcement — NOT a policy recommendation, a legal opinion, or a targeted advocacy ask (charter §7.4/§7.5). 'Needs an efficacy evaluation' means no rigorous evaluation exists, not that the rule provably fails. IMPORTANT: the 'commission an efficacy evaluation' count shows only the harms where evaluation is the TOP-priority gap (they already have both a binding rule and catalogued enforcement); in fact EVERY harm here lacks rigorous efficacy evidence — the rest surface under a higher-priority structural gap (e.g. build enforcement) first. Read efficacy as a field-wide deficit, not a problem for only some harms.","derivedFrom":{"accountabilityCompleteness":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/accountability-completeness","coverageEquity":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/coverage-equity","evidenceMap":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/evidence"},"license":"CC BY 4.0","attribution":"Policy Window — policywindow.org"}