EU AI Act vs Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management

What this comparison shows

On the topic of Development-Rights Framings, EU AI Act is classified as silent and Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management as implicit. The editorial verdict is asymmetric. One regime addresses the topic explicitly while the other covers it only implicitly or not at all; this is a likely site of regulatory arbitrage and a candidate for comparative-law follow-up.

Contested question: Is development-rights framing compatible with the EU AIA's rights-based framing, or do they conflict on operational decisions (e.g., who can deploy frontier models in developing economies)?