{"$schema":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/corrections.json","name":"Policy Window — public corrections ledger","description":"A public, falsifiable record of catalog claims that were wrong and were corrected because an EXTERNAL authoritative source contradicted them — the external-accountability complement to the self-correcting authoring ledger. Each entry names the prior claim, the corrected claim, and the external source (URL + verbatim quote + authority) a third party can check. `pending` entries are errors already identified and being fixed, disclosed before the fix lands. No completeness is claimed; it records the corrections made to date, plus the standing third-party submission channel.","docs":"https://policywindow.org/wiki/methodology","method":"Each correction is surfaced by an external-source-driven check (primary-source re-verification, a reality benchmark, the cross-article consistency scan, the §7.10 adversarial panel, or a third-party report). A build-time pin verifies every entry targets a real article, carries a resolving external-source URL + verbatim quote + named authority, and has a distinct prior vs corrected claim, so an entry cannot be invented.","generatedAt":"2026-07-11T21:09:15.542Z","summary":{"total":5,"corrected":3,"pending":2,"externallySourced":5,"bySurfacedBy":{"cross-article-consistency":1,"primary-source-reverification":2,"adversarial-panel":2},"byTargetKind":{"instrument-notes":2,"instrument-cell":3}},"headline":"5 catalog claims corrected against an external source (3 landed, 2 pending); every one carries a checkable external citation.","submissionChannel":"Third parties can submit a refutation via the 'Page feedback' widget on any article (opens a structured issue) or the corrections workflow at /wiki/methodology; the retraction + correction policy is /wiki/charter §6 (append-only; original text preserved via ?asOf= snapshot pinning).","corrections":[{"id":"eo-14110-revoking-order","targetKind":"instrument-notes","targetSlug":"us-eo-14110","targetLabel":"Which order revoked EO 14110","claimBefore":"Executive Order 14179 revoked Executive Order 14110.","claimAfter":"Executive Order 14110 was revoked by EO 14148 (20 Jan 2025); EO 14179 (23 Jan 2025) is the separate replacement AI-policy order and refers to EO 14110 as already revoked.","surfacedBy":"cross-article-consistency","status":"corrected","date":"2026-07-02","externalSource":{"url":"https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/initial-rescissions-of-harmful-executive-orders-and-actions/","quote":"The following executive actions are hereby revoked: ... Executive Order 14110 of October 30, 2023 (Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence).","authority":"The White House (whitehouse.gov) — official presidential action; also published as US Federal Register 90 FR 8237, doc. "},"note":"Surfaced by the cross-article consistency scan (the same error survived in several instruments' notes + prose tiers, which read as the article lead); corrected catalog-wide and the scanner extended to read notes."},{"id":"gsa-guide-legal-nature","targetKind":"instrument-cell","targetSlug":"gsa-ai-acquisition-guide","targetLabel":"GSA acquisition guide legal nature","claimBefore":"The catalog's coverage excerpts characterised the GSA guide with prescriptive, clause-like obligations.","claimAfter":"The GSA Generative AI Acquisition Resource Guide (29 Apr 2024) is a non-binding considerations/questions guide, not binding FAR clauses; the overclaiming excerpts were corrected to match the source.","surfacedBy":"primary-source-reverification","status":"corrected","date":"2026-07-02","externalSource":{"url":"https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/newsroom/news-releases/gsa-releases-generative-ai-acquisition-resource-gu-04292024","quote":"introduces questions that contracting officers should ask to make informed procurement decisions","authority":"gsa.gov (US General Services Administration)"},"note":"A prose-faithfulness re-judge traced apparent contradictions to the catalog's own provision excerpts overclaiming; primary-source re-verification proved the excerpts wrong and they were corrected (not the prose)."},{"id":"india-meity-advisory-date","targetKind":"instrument-notes","targetSlug":"india-dpdpa","targetLabel":"Revised MeitY AI advisory date","claimBefore":"The revised India MeitY AI advisory was dated April 2024.","claimAfter":"The revised MeitY AI advisory (eNo.2(4)/2023-CyberLaws-3, superseding the 1 Mar 2024 advisory) is dated 15 March 2024.","surfacedBy":"primary-source-reverification","status":"corrected","date":"2026-07-02","externalSource":{"url":"https://www.meity.gov.in/static/uploads/2024/02/9f6e99572739a3024c9cdaec53a0a0ef.pdf","quote":"Date: 15-03-2024 ... This advisory is issued in supersession of advisory eNo.2(4)/2023-CyberLaws-3, dated 1st March, 2024.","authority":"MeitY (Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India)"},"note":"Corrected against the MeitY-hosted advisory PDF."},{"id":"gpai-presumption-article","targetKind":"instrument-cell","targetSlug":"gpai-code-of-practice","targetLabel":"GPAI presumption-of-conformity article","claimBefore":"The presumption-of-compliance mechanism for GPAI was cited to EU AI Act Art. 56(8).","claimAfter":"The GPAI presumption / compliance-demonstration mechanism is Art. 53(4) (standard GPAI) and Art. 55(2) (systemic-risk GPAI); Art. 56(8) governs the Commission's approval of a code of practice, not the presumption.","surfacedBy":"adversarial-panel","status":"pending","date":"2026-07-09","externalSource":{"url":"https://ai-act-service-desk.ec.europa.eu/en/ai-act/article-55","quote":"Providers of general-purpose AI models with systemic risk may rely on codes of practice within the meaning of Article 56 to demonstrate compliance with the obligations set out in paragraph 1 of this Article, until a harmonised standard is published. Compliance with European harmonised standards grants providers the presumption of conformity to the extent that those standards cover those obligation","authority":"European Commission — EU AI Act Service Desk (official)"},"note":"Caught by the §7.10 adversarial panel while authoring GPAI prose; the article is HELD (not published) pending the catalog cell fix, since publishing correct prose against a wrong catalog cell would contradict the page."},{"id":"omb-redress-subparagraph","targetKind":"instrument-cell","targetSlug":"omb-m-24-10","targetLabel":"OMB M-24-10 individual-redress subparagraph","claimBefore":"The individual-redress (human consideration + remedy via a fallback/escalation system) duty was cited to M-24-10 Section 5(c)(v)(D).","claimAfter":"That duty is subparagraph (E) of M-24-10 Attachment 1 Section 5(c)(v) (which is lettered A-F); the citation should read (E), not (D).","surfacedBy":"adversarial-panel","status":"pending","date":"2026-07-11","externalSource":{"url":"https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/M-24-10-Advancing-Governance-Innovation-and-Risk-Management-for-Agency-Use-of-Artificial-Intelligence.pdf","quote":"Maintain human consideration and remedy processes ... provide timely human consideration and potential remedy ... via a fallback and escalation system in the event that an impacted individual would like to appeal or contest the AI's negative impacts.","authority":"The White House (M-24-10, Attachment 1, Section 5(c)(v)(E))"},"note":"Caught by the §7.10 adversarial panel while authoring OMB-M-24-10 prose (2026-07-11); the prose is HELD pending the one-cell catalog citation fix (D to E)."}]}