Sovereign AI Doctrine
sovereign_ai · AI-governance topic
Sovereign AI Doctrine is domestic-compute, export controls, jurisdiction-bound model deployment. Across 9 tracked AI-governance instruments, 2 address this topic explicitly, 0 via general principles, and 7 are silent.
Definition and scope
Domestic-compute, export controls, jurisdiction-bound model deployment.
The cross-jurisdiction picture below shows how each of 9 tracked instruments treats this topic. The patterns vary substantially — and 7 regimes are silent, leaving gaps that future policy work could address.
Cross-jurisdiction coverage
| Instrument | Jurisdiction | Coverage | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | EU | silent | No explicit sovereign-AI doctrine |
| Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI | US | governs | §4.8 (BIS export controls leverage) |
| UK Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (White Paper) | UK | silent | No explicit sovereign-AI position |
| Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management | CN | governs | Art. 17 (registration + algorithm filing) |
| G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct | G7 | silent | Not addressed |
| OECD AI Principles (Recommendation) | OECD | silent | Not addressed |
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI | council_of_europe | silent | Not addressed |
| UN GA Resolution on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI | UN | silent | Not addressed |
| NIST AI Risk Management Framework | US | silent | Not addressed |
Silent regimes — gap signal
Instruments that do not address Sovereign AI Doctrine — candidates for future policy work.
References
Take this further — sign up free
Save, compare, or get alerts when Sovereign AI Doctrine changes. Policy Window is the analyst workbench layered on top of this wiki — free for researchers, civil society, and verified policymakers.
2 instruments tracked.