EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Development-Rights Framings
silentEU framework is rights-based but rooted in EU-charter rights, not development-rights doctrine
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Development-Rights Framings
EU AI Act vs Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
Verdict: both silentDownload PDF
US · executive order
Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
US-EO-14110
Treatment of Development-Rights Framings
silentNot in US AI-governance vocabulary
Primary source: Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023)
What this comparison shows
On the topic of Development-Rights Framings, EU AI Act is classified as silent and Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI as silent. The editorial verdict is both silent. Neither instrument addresses this topic. This is a policy lacuna — there is no incumbent canonical position from either regime, so future regulator activity on this topic shapes the entire field.
Contested question: Is development-rights framing compatible with the EU AIA's rights-based framing, or do they conflict on operational decisions (e.g., who can deploy frontier models in developing economies)?
Bibliography
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act.
- Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023) — Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI.
- Policy Window — Development-Rights Framings (cross-jurisdiction topic article with full 26-instrument coverage matrix).