EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Training-Data Rights
implicitRecital 105; CDSM Directive provides primary copyright framework
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Training-Data Rights
EU AI Act vs Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
Verdict: asymmetricDownload PDF
US · executive order
Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
US-EO-14110
Treatment of Training-Data Rights
silentCopyright addressed by courts + USCO, not EO
Primary source: Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023)
What this comparison shows
On the topic of Training-Data Rights, EU AI Act is classified as implicit and Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI as silent. The editorial verdict is asymmetric. One regime addresses the topic explicitly while the other covers it only implicitly or not at all; this is a likely site of regulatory arbitrage and a candidate for comparative-law follow-up.
Contested question: Does the EU CDSM Directive's TDM-exemption cover commercial foundation-model training? Major active litigation (NYT v OpenAI, Getty v Stability) and parallel claim regimes in UK/JP/US.
Bibliography
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act.
- Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023) — Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI.
- Policy Window — Training-Data Rights (cross-jurisdiction topic article with full 26-instrument coverage matrix).