AI in Criminal Justice
criminal_justice · AI-governance topic
AI in Criminal Justice is predictive policing, risk assessment, sentencing assistance. Across 9 tracked AI-governance instruments, 3 address this topic explicitly, 1 via general principles, and 5 are silent.
Definition and scope
Predictive policing, risk assessment, sentencing assistance.
The cross-jurisdiction picture below shows how each of 9 tracked instruments treats this topic. The patterns vary substantially — and 5 regimes are silent, leaving gaps that future policy work could address.
Cross-jurisdiction coverage
| Instrument | Jurisdiction | Coverage | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | EU | governs | Annex III §6 (high-risk: law enforcement) |
| Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI | US | governs | §7.1(b) (DOJ AI use review) |
| UK Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (White Paper) | UK | implicit | Forensic Information Databases Strategy Board |
| Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management | CN | silent | Internal-government uses excluded from scope |
| G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct | G7 | silent | Not addressed directly |
| OECD AI Principles (Recommendation) | OECD | silent | Not addressed sectorally |
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI | council_of_europe | governs | Art. 14 (procedural safeguards) |
| UN GA Resolution on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI | UN | silent | Not addressed |
| NIST AI Risk Management Framework | US | silent | Cross-cutting; not sectoral |
Silent regimes — gap signal
Instruments that do not address AI in Criminal Justice — candidates for future policy work.
Related topics
Topics with similar coverage patterns across the tracked instruments.
References
Take this further — sign up free
Save, compare, or get alerts when AI in Criminal Justice changes. Policy Window is the analyst workbench layered on top of this wiki — free for researchers, civil society, and verified policymakers.
4 instruments tracked.