Seoul Declaration on Safe, Innovative and Inclusive AI — vendor disclosure form

1. Vendor identification

2. AI system identification

3. Provision-specific questions

1. Foundation Models / GPAI. Does the offered system meet the threshold for a general-purpose / foundation model under Seoul Declaration on Safe, Innovative and Inclusive AI (Declaration + accompanying Frontier AI Safety Commitments (16 signatory companies))? If yes, identify the specific obligations you will satisfy and the evidence you will provide.

   (Cite: Declaration + accompanying Frontier AI Safety Commitments (16 signatory companies))

2. Transparency Obligations. Provide the documentation required under the transparency obligations of Seoul Declaration on Safe, Innovative and Inclusive AI (Declaration §4 + Commitments §3 (publish safety frameworks)) — including (as applicable) model card, system card, training-data summary, evaluation results, and known limitations.

   (Cite: Declaration §4 + Commitments §3 (publish safety frameworks))

3. Catastrophic & Existential Risk. Has the offered system been evaluated against catastrophic-risk thresholds (e.g., CBRN information uplift, autonomous replication) consistent with Seoul Declaration on Safe, Innovative and Inclusive AI (Frontier AI Safety Commitments §1: identify thresholds for severe risks pre-deployment)? Provide the evaluation report or its public-disclosure equivalent.

   (Cite: Frontier AI Safety Commitments §1: identify thresholds for severe risks pre-deployment)

4. International Coordination. Describe the offered system's compliance posture relative to the Seoul Declaration on Safe, Innovative and Inclusive AI provisions identified at: Declaration §5-7 (AISI network, follow-up summits).

   (Cite: Declaration §5-7 (AISI network, follow-up summits))

5. Agentic AI Governance. Does the offered system act as an autonomous agent (multi-step tool-use, transactions, recursion) within scope of Seoul Declaration on Safe, Innovative and Inclusive AI (Frontier AI Safety Commitments §3 — pre-deployment capability evaluations include agentic behaviours under 'realistic deployment conditions')? Describe the tool-use surface, authorisation model, and human-oversight checkpoints.

   (Cite: Frontier AI Safety Commitments §3 — pre-deployment capability evaluations include agentic behaviours under 'realistic deployment conditions')

4. Documentation enclosures expected

Tick each enclosure attached to the vendor response. Missing enclosures should be explained in the “Variances” field below.

• Safety / capability evaluation results
• Vendor company registration + insurance certificates
• Sub-processor / supply-chain list (including model upstream)

5. Vendor attestation

The undersigned, on behalf of the vendor, attests that the disclosures above are true and complete to the best of their knowledge at the date signed, and undertakes to notify the buyer in writing within 30 days of any material change to those disclosures.