Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) v2 — vendor disclosure form

1. Vendor identification

2. AI system identification

3. Provision-specific questions

1. Foundation Models / GPAI. Does the offered system meet the threshold for a general-purpose / foundation model under Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) v2 (RSP v2 §2 — ASL framework applies to frontier model releases)? If yes, identify the specific obligations you will satisfy and the evidence you will provide.

   (Cite: RSP v2 §2 — ASL framework applies to frontier model releases)

2. Transparency Obligations. Provide the documentation required under the transparency obligations of Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) v2 (RSP v2 §5 — public publication of safety determinations + capability eval methodology) — including (as applicable) model card, system card, training-data summary, evaluation results, and known limitations.

   (Cite: RSP v2 §5 — public publication of safety determinations + capability eval methodology)

3. Catastrophic & Existential Risk. Has the offered system been evaluated against catastrophic-risk thresholds (e.g., CBRN information uplift, autonomous replication) consistent with Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) v2 (RSP v2 §3 — ASL-3 / ASL-4 capability thresholds explicitly target CBRN uplift + autonomous-replication)? Provide the evaluation report or its public-disclosure equivalent.

   (Cite: RSP v2 §3 — ASL-3 / ASL-4 capability thresholds explicitly target CBRN uplift + autonomous-replication)

4. Agentic AI Governance. Does the offered system act as an autonomous agent (multi-step tool-use, transactions, recursion) within scope of Anthropic Responsible Scaling Policy (RSP) v2 (RSP v2 — ASL thresholds include 'autonomous AI replication' + agentic capability evaluations)? Describe the tool-use surface, authorisation model, and human-oversight checkpoints.

   (Cite: RSP v2 — ASL thresholds include 'autonomous AI replication' + agentic capability evaluations)

4. Documentation enclosures expected

Tick each enclosure attached to the vendor response. Missing enclosures should be explained in the “Variances” field below.

• Safety / capability evaluation results
• Content provenance + watermarking technical description
• Vendor company registration + insurance certificates
• Sub-processor / supply-chain list (including model upstream)

5. Vendor attestation

The undersigned, on behalf of the vendor, attests that the disclosures above are true and complete to the best of their knowledge at the date signed, and undertakes to notify the buyer in writing within 30 days of any material change to those disclosures.