EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of AI in Criminal Justice
governsAnnex III §6 (high-risk: law enforcement)
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · AI in Criminal Justice
EU AI Act vs Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management
Verdict: asymmetricDownload PDF
CN · binding regulation
Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management
CN-GENAI-2023
Treatment of AI in Criminal Justice
silentInternal-government uses excluded from scope
Primary source: CAC Order No. 15
What this comparison shows
On the topic of AI in Criminal Justice, EU AI Act is classified as governs and Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management as silent. The editorial verdict is asymmetric. One regime addresses the topic explicitly while the other covers it only implicitly or not at all; this is a likely site of regulatory arbitrage and a candidate for comparative-law follow-up.
Contested question: Does algorithmic risk-assessment reduce or reproduce racial disparities? Empirical literature (ProPublica COMPAS critique vs. industry replication) is unresolved.
Bibliography
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act.
- CAC Order No. 15 — Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management.
- Policy Window — AI in Criminal Justice (cross-jurisdiction topic article with full 26-instrument coverage matrix).