EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Sovereign AI Doctrine
silentNo explicit sovereign-AI doctrine
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Sovereign AI Doctrine
EU AI Act vs Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management
Verdict: asymmetricDownload PDF
CN · binding regulation
Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management
CN-GENAI-2023
Treatment of Sovereign AI Doctrine
governsArt. 17 (registration + algorithm filing)
Primary source: CAC Order No. 15
What this comparison shows
On the topic of Sovereign AI Doctrine, EU AI Act is classified as silent and Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management as governs. The editorial verdict is asymmetric. One regime addresses the topic explicitly while the other covers it only implicitly or not at all; this is a likely site of regulatory arbitrage and a candidate for comparative-law follow-up.
Contested question: Is jurisdiction-bound model deployment technically feasible at frontier scale? Field literature is sparse; doctrine is post-2023 and largely aspirational.
Bibliography
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act.
- CAC Order No. 15 — Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management.
- Policy Window — Sovereign AI Doctrine (cross-jurisdiction topic article with full 26-instrument coverage matrix).