EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of International Coordination
silentNo specific provision — instrument is silent on this topic.
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · International Coordination
EU AI Act vs Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
Verdict: both silentDownload PDF
US · executive order
Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
US-EO-14110
Treatment of International Coordination
silentNo specific provision — instrument is silent on this topic.
Primary source: Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023)
What this comparison shows
On the topic of International Coordination, EU AI Act is classified as silent and Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI as silent. The editorial verdict is both silent. Neither instrument addresses this topic. This is a policy lacuna — there is no incumbent canonical position from either regime, so future regulator activity on this topic shapes the entire field.
Contested question: Will AI-governance coordination converge on the OECD / UN / G7 / GPAI / bilateral-MoU mode, or fragment into bloc-based regimes (US-led / EU-led / China-led)? Field consensus is forming but unsettled.
Bibliography
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act.
- Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023) — Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI.
- Policy Window — International Coordination (cross-jurisdiction topic article with full 26-instrument coverage matrix).