EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Sovereign AI Doctrine
silentNo explicit sovereign-AI doctrine
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Sovereign AI Doctrine
EU AI Act vs Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
Verdict: asymmetricDownload PDF
US · executive order
Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI
US-EO-14110
Treatment of Sovereign AI Doctrine
governs§4.8 (BIS export controls leverage)
Primary source: Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023)
What this comparison shows
On the topic of Sovereign AI Doctrine, EU AI Act is classified as silent and Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI as governs. The editorial verdict is asymmetric. One regime addresses the topic explicitly while the other covers it only implicitly or not at all; this is a likely site of regulatory arbitrage and a candidate for comparative-law follow-up.
Contested question: Is jurisdiction-bound model deployment technically feasible at frontier scale? Field literature is sparse; doctrine is post-2023 and largely aspirational.
Bibliography
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act.
- Exec. Order No. 14110, 88 Fed. Reg. 75191 (Nov. 1, 2023) — Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI.
- Policy Window — Sovereign AI Doctrine (cross-jurisdiction topic article with full 26-instrument coverage matrix).