Article 10
1 cell- governs
Arts. 6, 8, 9, 10 — strict-liability compensation for defective products incl. software/AI: compensable damage (Art. 6), liable economic operators (Art. 8), court-ordered evidence disclosure (Art. 9), and rebuttable presumptions of defect + causation (Art. 10)
Editor rationale: The directive's entire operative purpose is individual redress for damage caused by defective products, and Art. 4(1)/Recital 13 bring software and AI systems within 'product'. Arts. 6/8/9/10 together form a complete redress mechanism in the topic's own vocabulary, incl. the Art. 10(4) technical-complexity presumption aimed at opaque systems. Medium (not high): a directive needing national transposition whose AI-redress runs through the general product-liability presumptions, not AI-named provisions.
Verbatim text:
“A national court shall presume defectiveness or the causal link where the claimant faces excessive difficulties, in particular due to technical or scientific complexity, in proving it.”