Individual Redress
redress · AI-governance topic
Individual Redress is right to explanation, appeal mechanisms, complaint channels. Across 9 tracked AI-governance instruments, 4 address this topic explicitly, 2 via general principles, and 3 are silent.
Definition and scope
Right to explanation, appeal mechanisms, complaint channels.
The cross-jurisdiction picture below shows how each of 9 tracked instruments treats this topic. The patterns vary substantially — and 3 regimes are silent, leaving gaps that future policy work could address.
Cross-jurisdiction coverage
| Instrument | Jurisdiction | Coverage | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | EU | governs | Art. 85 (right to lodge complaints) |
| Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI | US | silent | Sectoral; no general AI-redress mechanism |
| UK Pro-Innovation Approach to AI Regulation (White Paper) | UK | implicit | Principle 5 (contestability + redress) |
| Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management | CN | governs | Art. 15 (complaint channels) |
| G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct | G7 | silent | Not addressed |
| OECD AI Principles (Recommendation) | OECD | governs | Principle 1.5 (accountability) |
| Council of Europe Framework Convention on AI | council_of_europe | governs | Arts. 14-15 (procedural safeguards + remedies) |
| UN GA Resolution on Safe, Secure, Trustworthy AI | UN | silent | Not addressed |
| NIST AI Risk Management Framework | US | implicit | Accountability characteristic |
Silent regimes — gap signal
Instruments that do not address Individual Redress — candidates for future policy work.
Related topics
Topics with similar coverage patterns across the tracked instruments.
References
Take this further — sign up free
Save, compare, or get alerts when Individual Redress changes. Policy Window is the analyst workbench layered on top of this wiki — free for researchers, civil society, and verified policymakers.
6 instruments tracked.