Procurement workflow surface

G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct — provisions explorer

A procurement officer evaluating a vendor against G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct can use this page to walk the operative articles + paragraphs the instrument touches, anchored to the primary source. Each row groups every coverage cell that names that article so the reader sees WHICH governance topic each clause speaks to. Use it as a checklist scaffold, not as legal advice (see charter §7.4).

§1

2 cells

governs
Catastrophic & Existential Risk
Code §1 + §3 — explicit risk-identification including CBRN
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
implicit
Agentic AI Governance
Code §1 'advanced AI systems' + §3 risk-identification cover agentic behaviour through capability frame
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023

§2

1 cell

governs
Transparency Obligations
Code §2 (publicly report capabilities, limitations)
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
Contract clause language candidates
Candidate language — not legal advice (see /wiki/charter §7.4)
- Vendor shall, on request, produce evidence of completion of any reporting, registration, or conformity-assessment obligations attaching to the offered system under G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct §2, and shall notify the buyer in writing within 30 days of any material change to that compliance status.

§5

1 cell

governs
Deepfakes / Synthetic Content
Code §5 (content provenance + watermarking)
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
Contract clause language candidates
Candidate language — not legal advice (see /wiki/charter §7.4)
- Vendor shall provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the transparency / disclosure obligations identified at G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct §5, including (as applicable) machine-readable provenance markers, model cards, and end-user disclosure flows.

§6

2 cells

governs
Synthetic Content Provenance
Code §6 — 'develop and deploy reliable content authentication and provenance mechanisms'
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
implicit
Environmental Impact of AI Training
Code §6 references sustainable AI development; not detailed obligation
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023

Unanchored citations

2 cells

governs
Foundation Models / GPAI
Code applies to advanced AI
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
implicit
Technological Sovereignty
Adoption-by-developer framing; G7 carries implicit sovereignty assumptions
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023

Procurement workflow surface

G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct — provisions explorer

§1

2 cells

governs
Catastrophic & Existential Risk
Code §1 + §3 — explicit risk-identification including CBRN
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
implicit
Agentic AI Governance
Code §1 'advanced AI systems' + §3 risk-identification cover agentic behaviour through capability frame
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023

§2

1 cell

governs
Transparency Obligations
Code §2 (publicly report capabilities, limitations)
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
Contract clause language candidates
Candidate language — not legal advice (see /wiki/charter §7.4)
- Vendor shall, on request, produce evidence of completion of any reporting, registration, or conformity-assessment obligations attaching to the offered system under G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct §2, and shall notify the buyer in writing within 30 days of any material change to that compliance status.

§5

1 cell

governs
Deepfakes / Synthetic Content
Code §5 (content provenance + watermarking)
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
Contract clause language candidates
Candidate language — not legal advice (see /wiki/charter §7.4)
- Vendor shall provide documentation demonstrating compliance with the transparency / disclosure obligations identified at G7 Hiroshima AI Process Code of Conduct §5, including (as applicable) machine-readable provenance markers, model cards, and end-user disclosure flows.

§6

2 cells

governs
Synthetic Content Provenance
Code §6 — 'develop and deploy reliable content authentication and provenance mechanisms'
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
implicit
Environmental Impact of AI Training
Code §6 references sustainable AI development; not detailed obligation
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023

Unanchored citations

2 cells

governs
Foundation Models / GPAI
Code applies to advanced AI
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023
implicit
Technological Sovereignty
Adoption-by-developer framing; G7 carries implicit sovereignty assumptions
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Open primary source: G7 Hiroshima AI Process, Oct 2023