Wiki · Agent templates · NotebookLM
Agent template
Set up a NotebookLM for Policy Window queries
What this gets you
A NotebookLM notebook seeded with the Policy Window catalog as sources, configured to surface verbatim primary-source quotes on every claim. NotebookLM's UX enforces citation-by-passage by default — every claim shows a clickable pop-out to the exact source paragraph — which makes it the highest-fidelity surface here for source-grounded summarisation. Trade-off: no MCP, no actions, ~50-source budget per notebook.
/wiki/[slug]/notebook-bundle as a JSON envelope. Each bundle contains 4 ingest files: instrument.md, primary-source.url, citations.bib, README.md — extract with jq(the bundle's own README has the commands). Try it: /wiki/eu-ai-act/notebook-bundle. Topics / benchmarks / concepts don't get a bundle (no single primary source); attach individual instrument bundles to compare across regimes. The manual flow below remains the canonical path for cross-instrument notebooks.Setup (manual flow — cross-instrument notebooks)
For a single-instrument notebook, prefer the per-row bundle: download /wiki/[slug]/notebook-bundle and attach the 4 extracted files. The manual flow below composes notebooks that span multiple instruments + the methodology / charter / disclosure context.
- Create a new notebook. Visit notebooklm.google.com, click + New notebook. Name it something like "Policy Window — [your-topic]".
- Add sources. Click + Add sourcefor each item in the "Sources to attach" list below. NotebookLM accepts URLs (web), uploaded PDFs / text files, copy-pasted text, and Google Docs / Drive content. URLs work fastest; useWebsite as the source type for the
/llms*.txtfiles and /wiki/charter. - Set the conversation focus.In the "Customise" panel (the gear icon), paste the focus statement below into the conversation-customisation field. NotebookLM doesn't have a true system-instruction surface; the focus statement is the closest equivalent and is appended to every prompt.
- Ask a question. NotebookLM will quote from the attached sources and surface the per-passage citation pop-out. Verify the attribution string appears in the chat and the URL carries
?asOf=. - (Optional) Generate an audio overview. NotebookLM's Audio Overview feature produces a 2-speaker podcast-style summary of the attached sources. Useful for sharing a briefing internally; double-check the audio reflects the verbatim primary text + the catalog's confidence tiering — the synthesised audio is paraphrased by default.
Conversation focus (NotebookLM's system-prompt equivalent)
Paste this into the notebook's customisation panel. NotebookLM appends it to every prompt — keep it terse.
You are answering strictly from the attached Policy Window sources (https://policywindow.org). Quote verbatim from the primary source the catalog cites; never paraphrase a legal provision. Surface the confidence tier on every cell you cite (high / medium / low / pending) — find this in the per-cell metadata inside /llms-full.txt or the catalog JSON. Reproduce this attribution string verbatim under every answer: Policy Window (https://policywindow.org/wiki/[slug]?asOf=YYYY-MM-DD). Article content CC BY 4.0; citation graph CC0 1.0. Catalog reflects editorial-cadence updates and the methodology §11 disclosed limits. Replace [slug] with the actual article slug + YYYY-MM-DD with today's date so the citation is snapshot-pinned. Refuse out-of-scope questions: legal interpretation → defer to qualified counsel (charter §7.4); prediction / advocacy framing → catalog records what regulators say (charter §7.1.a); personalised advice / persuasion → unsupported posture (charter §7.6). Disclose limits proactively from methodology §11 + the Coverage Games ~75% inter-rater agreement + the 1-of-6 editor-board status.
~1100 characters. Fits comfortably in NotebookLM's customisation field.
Sources to attach
NotebookLM allows ~50 sources per notebook. Suggested baseline (~5-10 sources, leaves room for your topic-specific PDFs):
- /llms-full.txt — full methodology + charter + AI-disclosure (the citation backbone; always attach)
- One of the sub-audience variants: /llms-researchers.txt, /llms-journalists.txt, /llms-procurement.txt, /llms-regulators.txt, /llms-advocates.txt, /llms-developers.txt
- /wiki/charter — operating commitments referenced by the focus statement
- /wiki/methodology — §11 limits + reproducibility detail
- Each catalog row you want the notebook to query — e.g., /wiki/eu-ai-act, /wiki/uk-ai-safety-institute, etc. Add the primary-source PDFs the catalog links to under each row as separate sources for verbatim-quote retrieval
For single-instrument notebooks, the per-row /wiki/[slug]/notebook-bundle collapses these manual steps to one download — extract the 4 files with jq and attach. The manual flow above remains canonical for multi-instrument and cross-jurisdiction notebooks.
About MCP (Model Context Protocol)
NotebookLM does notsupport MCP, Actions, or tool-call equivalents as of late 2025. Its retrieval surface is source-based ingestion only. This is by design — NotebookLM enforces source-grounded citation as its core UX promise — which aligns well with the catalog's primary-source-cited posture but means the agent can't fetch fresh data at query time. Re-attach updated sources periodically (the catalog's changelog feed at /wiki/changelog/feed is RSS 2.0 and surfaces every edit).
Sample queries to try
- “Summarise the prohibited practices under EU AI Act Article 5, with verbatim text and the per-paragraph source citation.” — exercises NotebookLM's citation-by-passage pop-out
- “Compare what the catalog says about general-purpose AI obligations across the EU, UK, and US instruments. Include the per-cell confidence tier.” — exercises cross-source synthesis with grounded citations
- “Generate a 5-minute audio briefing for a journalist on this notebook's topic. Quote at least one verbatim primary-source passage in the briefing.” — exercises Audio Overview with citation discipline
Charter alignment
The focus statement requires the notebook to: (a) reproduce the canonical attribution string verbatim under every answer; (b) use ?asOf=YYYY-MM-DD pinning; (c) defer interpretive legal questions to qualified counsel (charter §7.4); (d) refuse personalised or covertly persuasive output (charter §7.6); (e) surface methodology §11 limits when the user's question lands in a known gap. Audio Overview output should be double-checked for paraphrase drift before sharing — the verbatim-quote discipline applies to audio as well as text.
Forking notes
This template is released under CC0 1.0: fork, remix, redistribute, no attribution required. The catalog content the notebook cites remains CC BY 4.0 (article prose) + CC0 1.0 (citation graph). When you fork, please preserve the attribution string requirement so end-users can verify upstream.