Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) — vendor disclosure form

1. Vendor identification

2. AI system identification

3. Provision-specific questions

1. Foundation Models / GPAI. Does the offered system meet the threshold for a general-purpose / foundation model under Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) (PL 2338/2023 Arts. 17-19 (general-purpose AI systemic-risk obligations))? If yes, identify the specific obligations you will satisfy and the evidence you will provide.

   (Cite: PL 2338/2023 Arts. 17-19 (general-purpose AI systemic-risk obligations))

2. Transparency Obligations. Provide the documentation required under the transparency obligations of Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) (PL 2338/2023 Art. 7 (right to information about AI use + algorithmic explanation)) — including (as applicable) model card, system card, training-data summary, evaluation results, and known limitations.

   (Cite: PL 2338/2023 Art. 7 (right to information about AI use + algorithmic explanation))

3. Individual Redress. Describe the end-user redress + complaint channel offered for the system, including documented appeal path and response-time commitment, consistent with Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) (PL 2338/2023 Art. 9 (right to contest AI decisions, ANPD as regulator)).

   (Cite: PL 2338/2023 Art. 9 (right to contest AI decisions, ANPD as regulator))

4. Catastrophic & Existential Risk. Has the offered system been evaluated against catastrophic-risk thresholds (e.g., CBRN information uplift, autonomous replication) consistent with Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) (PL 2338/2023 Art. 14 (excessive-risk AI applications — explicit prohibition + risk-tier framework))? Provide the evaluation report or its public-disclosure equivalent.

   (Cite: PL 2338/2023 Art. 14 (excessive-risk AI applications — explicit prohibition + risk-tier framework))

5. Development-Rights Framings. Describe the offered system's compliance posture relative to the Brazil AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) provisions identified at: PL 2338/2023 Arts. 3-4 (founding principles include 'sustainable development' + 'human dignity' — distinct from EU AIA's rights-only framing).

   (Cite: PL 2338/2023 Arts. 3-4 (founding principles include 'sustainable development' + 'human dignity' — distinct from EU AIA's rights-only framing))

4. Documentation enclosures expected

Tick each enclosure attached to the vendor response. Missing enclosures should be explained in the “Variances” field below.

• Transparency documentation (per-instrument schema)
• Content provenance + watermarking technical description
• Vendor company registration + insurance certificates
• Sub-processor / supply-chain list (including model upstream)

5. Vendor attestation

The undersigned, on behalf of the vendor, attests that the disclosures above are true and complete to the best of their knowledge at the date signed, and undertakes to notify the buyer in writing within 30 days of any material change to those disclosures.