EU · binding regulation
EU AI Act
EU-AIA-2024
Treatment of Deepfakes / Synthetic Content
governsArt. 50(4) (disclosure obligation for deep fakes)
Primary source: Regulation (EU) 2024/1689
Comparative jurisdictional memo · Deepfakes / Synthetic Content
EU AI Act vs Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management
Verdict: convergesDownload PDF
CN · binding regulation
Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management
CN-GENAI-2023
Treatment of Deepfakes / Synthetic Content
governsArt. 12 (labelling) + Deep Synthesis Rules
Primary source: CAC Order No. 15
What this comparison shows
On the topic of Deepfakes / Synthetic Content, EU AI Act is classified as governs and Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management as governs. The editorial verdict is converges. The two regimes take the same position; this is a candidate for cross-jurisdictional alignment in industry guidance, voluntary codes, and harmonisation tracks.
Contested question: Is robust watermarking durable under adversarial removal at deployment scale? Field is split on technical feasibility despite policy convergence on the requirement.
Bibliography
- Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — EU AI Act.
- CAC Order No. 15 — Interim Measures for Generative AI Service Management.
- Policy Window — Deepfakes / Synthetic Content (cross-jurisdiction topic article with full 26-instrument coverage matrix).