Procurement workflow surface
A procurement officer evaluating a vendor against OMB Memorandum M-24-10 (Advancing Governance, Innovation, and Risk Management for Agency Use of AI) can use this page to walk the operative articles + paragraphs the instrument touches, anchored to the primary source. Each row groups every coverage cell that names that article so the reader sees WHICH governance topic each clause speaks to. Use it as a checklist scaffold, not as legal advice (see charter §7.4).
§3(a)(iv) public AI use-case inventory; Attachment 1 §5(c)(v) plain-language public notice + explanation for rights-impacting AI
Verbatim text:
“Agencies must individually inventory each of their AI use cases at least annually, submit the inventory to OMB, and post a public version of the inventory on the agency website.”
§3(a)(iv)–(v) annual public AI use-case inventory + quarterly AI procurement reporting to OMB
Editor rationale: Closest existing topic for the agency-AI-inventory + procurement-disclosure obligations; the operative trigger is agency-use enumeration not training-compute. A dedicated `procurement_disclosure` or `agency_ai_inventory` topic would be a better fit; topic-taxonomy extension deferred to iter-320+.
Verbatim text:
“Agencies must report to OMB and, as appropriate, publicly release aggregate metrics about their AI use cases that are determined to be safety-impacting or rights-impacting.”
Attachment 1 §5(c)(v)(D) human consideration + remedy for rights-impacting AI; opt-out where practicable
Verbatim text:
“For rights-impacting AI, agencies must provide timely human consideration and potential remedy through a fallback and escalation process where individuals can appeal or contest adverse decisions.”
§5 + Attachment 1 — minimum practices apply to safety- + rights-impacting AI regardless of foundation-model classification; no compute-threshold trigger
Editor rationale: OMB M-24-10 governs by AI-use-classification (safety/rights-impacting) rather than by foundation-model capability; cell marked implicit because the operative obligations attach to category-of-use not category-of-model.
Verbatim text:
“Before agencies use new or existing safety-impacting or rights-impacting AI, they must implement the minimum practices in this section; if they cannot, they must cease using the AI until compliance is achieved.”
Attachment 1 examples include employment + benefits decisions as rights-impacting; minimum practices apply
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.
Attachment 1 examples include healthcare access decisions as rights-impacting; minimum practices apply
Verbatim text:
Verbatim text not yet transcribed — see primary source.